This is just a quick comment, but very nice extension of the medium, Alex! I think even Bazerman's chapter invites us to (if not explicitly) extend intertext to all manner and form and understanding of "text," even if his method in that chapter was mostly informed by print/literary examples. In fact, part of our collective challenge as a class is to determine what an evolving understanding of "text" means for Bazerman's techniques and levels. Do they stretch them? Go against the grain? Complicate them? Reinforce them? Require us to come up with new ones? Or simply provide more examples of the same?
This is just a quick comment, but very nice extension of the medium, Alex! I think even Bazerman's chapter invites us to (if not explicitly) extend intertext to all manner and form and understanding of "text," even if his method in that chapter was mostly informed by print/literary examples. In fact, part of our collective challenge as a class is to determine what an evolving understanding of "text" means for Bazerman's techniques and levels. Do they stretch them? Go against the grain? Complicate them? Reinforce them? Require us to come up with new ones? Or simply provide more examples of the same?
ReplyDeleteFellow C&H fan,
-Prof. Graban